Gambia vs United States: Competitive elections

Gambia
1
in 2025
United States
1
in 2025
Gambia rank
1st
United States rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Gambia
  • United States
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 1 against 1 in United States, a difference of 0.

Across all 137 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.

Gambia ranks 1st and United States ranks 1st of 197 countries.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia United States Difference Ahead
1880s 0 1 1 United States
1890s 0 1 1 United States
1900s 0 1 1 United States
1910s 0 1 1 United States
1920s 0 1 1 United States
1930s 0 1 1 United States
1940s 0 1 1 United States
1950s 0 1 1 United States
1960s 0.7 1 0.3 United States
1970s 1 1 0
1980s 1 1 0
1990s 0.4 1 0.6 United States
2000s 0 1 1 United States
2010s 0.3 1 0.7 United States
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Gambia or United States?
Gambia, at 1 against 1 in United States as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Gambia and United States?
0, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and United States?
137 years are reported by both, from 1889 to 2025.
How do Gambia and United States rank globally for competitive elections?
Gambia ranks 1st and United States ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.