Gambia, The vs New Zealand: Competitive elections
Gambia, The
1
in 2025
New Zealand
1
in 2025
Gambia, The rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Gambia, The
- New Zealand
How they compare
Gambia, The currently reports 1 against 1 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 137 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Gambia, The ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia, The | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1890s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 1960s | 0.7 | 1 | 0.3 | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.4 | 1 | 0.6 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0 | 1 | 1 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.3 | 1 | 0.7 | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Gambia, The or New Zealand?
- Gambia, The, at 1 against 1 in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Gambia, The and New Zealand?
- 0, with Gambia, The ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia, The and New Zealand?
- 137 years are reported by both, from 1889 to 2025.
- How do Gambia, The and New Zealand rank globally for competitive elections?
- Gambia, The ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.