El Salvador vs Uzbekistan: Competitive elections

El Salvador
0
in 2025
Uzbekistan
0
in 2025
El Salvador rank
116th
Uzbekistan rank
116th

Competitive elections over time

  • El Salvador
  • Uzbekistan
00.20.40.60.81183819312025

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0 against 0 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 151 shared years of data; in 1865 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

El Salvador ranks 116th and Uzbekistan ranks 116th of 197 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0.6 0 0.6 El Salvador
1990s 1 0 1 El Salvador
2000s 1 0 1 El Salvador
2010s 1 0 1 El Salvador
2020s 0.6667 0 0.6667 El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, El Salvador or Uzbekistan?
El Salvador, at 0 against 0 in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between El Salvador and Uzbekistan?
0, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Uzbekistan?
151 years are reported by both, from 1865 to 2025.
How do El Salvador and Uzbekistan rank globally for competitive elections?
El Salvador ranks 116th and Uzbekistan ranks 116th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.