El Salvador vs Singapore: Competitive elections
El Salvador
0
in 2025
Singapore
0
in 2025
El Salvador rank
116th
Singapore rank
116th
Competitive elections over time
- El Salvador
- Singapore
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0 against 0 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 159 shared years of data; in 1867 it was Singapore ahead.
El Salvador ranks 116th and Singapore ranks 116th of 197 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 1 | 0 | 1 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 1 | 0 | 1 | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 0.6667 | 0 | 0.6667 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, El Salvador or Singapore?
- El Salvador, at 0 against 0 in Singapore as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between El Salvador and Singapore?
- 0, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Singapore?
- 159 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and Singapore rank globally for competitive elections?
- El Salvador ranks 116th and Singapore ranks 116th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.