Dominican Republic vs Lebanon: Competitive elections

Dominican Republic
1
in 2025
Lebanon
1
in 2025
Dominican Republic rank
1st
Lebanon rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Lebanon
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 1 against 1 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Lebanon ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Lebanon ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 3 and Lebanon in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Lebanon Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0.3 0 0.3 Dominican Republic
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0.9 0.9 Lebanon
1960s 0 1 1 Lebanon
1970s 0.2 0.6 0.4 Lebanon
1980s 1 0 1 Dominican Republic
1990s 0.8 0 0.8 Dominican Republic
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Dominican Republic or Lebanon?
Dominican Republic, at 1 against 1 in Lebanon as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Dominican Republic and Lebanon?
0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Lebanon?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Dominican Republic and Lebanon rank globally for competitive elections?
Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Lebanon ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.