Dominican Republic vs Jamaica: Competitive elections

Dominican Republic
1
in 2025
Jamaica
1
in 2025
Dominican Republic rank
1st
Jamaica rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Jamaica
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 1 against 1 in Jamaica, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 142 shared years of data; in 1884 it was Jamaica ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Jamaica ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 15 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Jamaica in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Jamaica Difference Ahead
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0.3 0 0.3 Dominican Republic
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0.8 0.8 Jamaica
1970s 0.2 1 0.8 Jamaica
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 0.8 1 0.2 Jamaica
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Dominican Republic or Jamaica?
Dominican Republic, at 1 against 1 in Jamaica as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Dominican Republic and Jamaica?
0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Jamaica?
142 years are reported by both, from 1884 to 2025.
How do Dominican Republic and Jamaica rank globally for competitive elections?
Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Jamaica ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.