Dominica vs Dominican Republic: Competitive elections

Dominica
1
in 2025
Dominican Republic
1
in 2025
Dominica rank
1st
Dominican Republic rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Dominica
  • Dominican Republic
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 1 against 1 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 102 shared years of data; in 1924 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominica ranks 1st and Dominican Republic ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 11 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 3 and Dominican Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1920s 0 0.5 0.5 Dominican Republic
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0.3 0 0.3 Dominica
1970s 1 0.2 0.8 Dominica
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 0.8 0.2 Dominica
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Dominica or Dominican Republic?
Dominica, at 1 against 1 in Dominican Republic as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Dominica and Dominican Republic?
0, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Dominican Republic?
102 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2025.
How do Dominica and Dominican Republic rank globally for competitive elections?
Dominica ranks 1st and Dominican Republic ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.