Croatia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Competitive elections

Croatia
1
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
1
in 2025
Croatia rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Croatia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.20.40.60.81188919572025

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Croatia ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0.9 0 0.9 Croatia
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0.8 0.8 Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0 1 1 Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0 1 1 Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Croatia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Croatia, at 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Croatia and Trinidad and Tobago?
0, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Trinidad and Tobago?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for competitive elections?
Croatia ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.