Costa Rica vs Paraguay: Competitive elections

Costa Rica
1
in 2025
Paraguay
1
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
1st
Paraguay rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Paraguay
00.20.40.60.81181119182025

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 1 against 1 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 188 shared years of data; in 1838 it was Paraguay ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Paraguay Difference Ahead
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0.9 0 0.9 Costa Rica
1910s 0.8 0 0.8 Costa Rica
1920s 1 0 1 Costa Rica
1930s 1 0 1 Costa Rica
1940s 0.9 0 0.9 Costa Rica
1950s 1 0 1 Costa Rica
1960s 1 0 1 Costa Rica
1970s 1 0 1 Costa Rica
1980s 1 0.1 0.9 Costa Rica
1990s 1 1 0
2000s 1 1 0
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Costa Rica or Paraguay?
Costa Rica, at 1 against 1 in Paraguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Costa Rica and Paraguay?
0, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Paraguay?
188 years are reported by both, from 1838 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Paraguay rank globally for competitive elections?
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.