Costa Rica vs Gambia: Competitive elections

Costa Rica
1
in 2025
Gambia
1
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
1st
Gambia rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Gambia
00.20.40.60.81183819312025

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 1 against 1 in Gambia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 137 shared years of data; in 1889 it was Gambia ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 1st and Gambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Gambia Difference Ahead
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0.9 0 0.9 Costa Rica
1910s 0.8 0 0.8 Costa Rica
1920s 1 0 1 Costa Rica
1930s 1 0 1 Costa Rica
1940s 0.9 0 0.9 Costa Rica
1950s 1 0 1 Costa Rica
1960s 1 0.7 0.3 Costa Rica
1970s 1 1 0
1980s 1 1 0
1990s 1 0.4 0.6 Costa Rica
2000s 1 0 1 Costa Rica
2010s 1 0.3 0.7 Costa Rica
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Costa Rica or Gambia?
Costa Rica, at 1 against 1 in Gambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Costa Rica and Gambia?
0, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Gambia?
137 years are reported by both, from 1889 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Gambia rank globally for competitive elections?
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Gambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.