Colombia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Competitive elections
Colombia
1
in 2025
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1
in 2025
Colombia rank
1st
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Colombia
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Colombia ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.2222 | 0 | 0.2222 | Colombia |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | Colombia |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Colombia or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Colombia, at 1 against 1 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Colombia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
- How do Colombia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for competitive elections?
- Colombia ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.