Central African Republic vs Western Sahara: Competitive elections
Central African Republic
0
in 2025
Western Sahara
0
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
116th
Western Sahara rank
116th
Competitive elections over time
- Central African Republic
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 0 against 0 in Western Sahara, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Western Sahara ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 116th and Western Sahara ranks 116th of 197 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Western Sahara | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.7 | 0 | 0.7 | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Central African Republic or Western Sahara?
- Central African Republic, at 0 against 0 in Western Sahara as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Central African Republic and Western Sahara?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Western Sahara?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Western Sahara rank globally for competitive elections?
- Central African Republic ranks 116th and Western Sahara ranks 116th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.