Central African Republic vs United Arab Emirates: Competitive elections
Central African Republic
0
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
0
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
116th
United Arab Emirates rank
116th
Competitive elections over time
- Central African Republic
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 0 against 0 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 116th and United Arab Emirates ranks 116th of 197 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0.7 | 0 | 0.7 | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Central African Republic or United Arab Emirates?
- Central African Republic, at 0 against 0 in United Arab Emirates as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Central African Republic and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and United Arab Emirates?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and United Arab Emirates rank globally for competitive elections?
- Central African Republic ranks 116th and United Arab Emirates ranks 116th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.