Cape Verde vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Competitive elections

Cape Verde
1
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1
in 2025
Cape Verde rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.

Across all 89 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0.3 0.3 Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0 1 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0 1 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.9 1 0.1 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Cape Verde or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Cape Verde, at 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Cape Verde and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
89 years are reported by both, from 1937 to 2025.
How do Cape Verde and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for competitive elections?
Cape Verde ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.