Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Competitive elections

Bosnia and Herzegovina
1
in 2025
Namibia
1
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
1st
Namibia rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Namibia
00.20.40.60.81188419542025

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1 against 1 in Namibia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Namibia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Namibia ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Namibia Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0.9 0 0.9 Bosnia and Herzegovina
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0.4 1 0.6 Namibia
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Namibia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1 against 1 in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia rank globally for competitive elections?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 1st and Namibia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.