Belgium vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Competitive elections

Belgium
1
in 2025
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1
in 2025
Belgium rank
1st
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Belgium
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1950s 1 0 1 Belgium
1960s 1 0.1 0.9 Belgium
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Belgium or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Belgium, at 1 against 1 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Belgium and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do Belgium and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for competitive elections?
Belgium ranks 1st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.