Bangladesh vs Central African Republic: Competitive elections

Bangladesh
0
in 2025
Central African Republic
0
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
116th
Central African Republic rank
116th

Competitive elections over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Central African Republic
00.20.40.60.81189419592025

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0 against 0 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 116th and Central African Republic ranks 116th of 197 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Central African Republic Difference Ahead
1970s 0 0 0
1980s 0 0 0
1990s 1 0.7 0.3 Bangladesh
2000s 0.9 0.3 0.6 Bangladesh
2010s 0.4 0 0.4 Bangladesh
2020s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Bangladesh or Central African Republic?
Bangladesh, at 0 against 0 in Central African Republic as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Bangladesh and Central African Republic?
0, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Central African Republic?
55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Central African Republic rank globally for competitive elections?
Bangladesh ranks 116th and Central African Republic ranks 116th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.