Bahamas vs San Marino: Competitive elections

Bahamas
1
in 2025
San Marino
1
in 2025
Bahamas rank
1st
San Marino rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Bahamas
  • San Marino
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 1 against 1 in San Marino, a difference of 0.

Across all 237 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 197 countries.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 25 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas San Marino Difference Ahead
1780s 0 0 0
1790s 0 0 0
1800s 0 0 0
1810s 0 0 0
1820s 0 0 0
1830s 0 0 0
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0 0
1870s 0 0 0
1880s 0 0 0
1890s 0 0 0
1900s 0 0.4 0.4 San Marino
1910s 0 1 1 San Marino
1920s 0 0.1 0.1 San Marino
1930s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0.5 0.5 San Marino
1950s 0 1 1 San Marino
1960s 0.6 1 0.4 San Marino
1970s 1 1 0
1980s 1 1 0
1990s 1 1 0
2000s 1 1 0
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Bahamas or San Marino?
Bahamas, at 1 against 1 in San Marino as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Bahamas and San Marino?
0, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and San Marino?
237 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
How do Bahamas and San Marino rank globally for competitive elections?
Bahamas ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.