Australia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Competitive elections

Australia
1
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
1
in 2025
Australia rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Australia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 137 shared years of data; in 1889 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1880s 1 0 1 Australia
1890s 1 0 1 Australia
1900s 1 0 1 Australia
1910s 1 0 1 Australia
1920s 1 0 1 Australia
1930s 1 0 1 Australia
1940s 1 0 1 Australia
1950s 1 0 1 Australia
1960s 1 0.8 0.2 Australia
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Australia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Australia, at 1 against 1 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Australia and Trinidad and Tobago?
0, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Trinidad and Tobago?
137 years are reported by both, from 1889 to 2025.
How do Australia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for competitive elections?
Australia ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.