Armenia vs New Zealand: Competitive elections

Armenia
1
in 2025
New Zealand
1
in 2025
Armenia rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Armenia
  • New Zealand
00.20.40.60.81184119332025

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 1 against 1 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.

Across all 104 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1920s 0 1 1 New Zealand
1930s 0 1 1 New Zealand
1940s 0 1 1 New Zealand
1950s 0 1 1 New Zealand
1960s 0 1 1 New Zealand
1970s 0 1 1 New Zealand
1980s 0 1 1 New Zealand
1990s 0 1 1 New Zealand
2000s 0 1 1 New Zealand
2010s 0.2 1 0.8 New Zealand
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Armenia or New Zealand?
Armenia, at 1 against 1 in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Armenia and New Zealand?
0, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and New Zealand?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Armenia and New Zealand rank globally for competitive elections?
Armenia ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.