Argentina vs New Zealand: Competitive elections

Argentina
1
in 2025
New Zealand
1
in 2025
Argentina rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Argentina
  • New Zealand
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 1 against 1 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.

Across all 185 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 19 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina New Zealand Difference Ahead
1840s 0 0 0
1850s 0 0 0
1860s 0 0.5 0.5 New Zealand
1870s 0 1 1 New Zealand
1880s 0 1 1 New Zealand
1890s 0 1 1 New Zealand
1900s 0 1 1 New Zealand
1910s 0.8 1 0.2 New Zealand
1920s 1 1 0
1930s 0 1 1 New Zealand
1940s 0.4 1 0.6 New Zealand
1950s 0.3 1 0.7 New Zealand
1960s 0.5 1 0.5 New Zealand
1970s 0.3 1 0.7 New Zealand
1980s 0.7 1 0.3 New Zealand
1990s 1 1 0
2000s 1 1 0
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Argentina or New Zealand?
Argentina, at 1 against 1 in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Argentina and New Zealand?
0, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and New Zealand?
185 years are reported by both, from 1841 to 2025.
How do Argentina and New Zealand rank globally for competitive elections?
Argentina ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.