Antigua and Barbuda vs Zambia: Competitive elections

Antigua and Barbuda
1
in 2025
Zambia
1
in 2025
Antigua and Barbuda rank
1st
Zambia rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Zambia
00.20.40.60.81191119682025

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 1 against 1 in Zambia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Zambia ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Zambia Difference Ahead
1950s 0 0 0
1960s 0.3 0 0.3 Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 1 0 1 Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0 0 0
1990s 0 0.9 0.9 Zambia
2000s 0.6 1 0.4 Zambia
2010s 1 0.6 0.4 Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 1 0.8333 0.1667 Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Antigua and Barbuda or Zambia?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 1 against 1 in Zambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Antigua and Barbuda and Zambia?
0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Zambia?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Zambia rank globally for competitive elections?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.