Antigua and Barbuda vs United Kingdom: Competitive elections

Antigua and Barbuda
1
in 2025
United Kingdom
1
in 2025
Antigua and Barbuda rank
1st
United Kingdom rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • United Kingdom
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 1 against 1 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.

Across all 75 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 197 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1950s 0 1 1 United Kingdom
1960s 0.3 1 0.7 United Kingdom
1970s 1 1 0
1980s 0 1 1 United Kingdom
1990s 0 1 1 United Kingdom
2000s 0.6 1 0.4 United Kingdom
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Antigua and Barbuda or United Kingdom?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 1 against 1 in United Kingdom as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Antigua and Barbuda and United Kingdom?
0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and United Kingdom?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and United Kingdom rank globally for competitive elections?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.