Antigua and Barbuda vs East Timor: Competitive elections

Antigua and Barbuda
1
in 2025
East Timor
1
in 2025
Antigua and Barbuda rank
1st
East Timor rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • East Timor
00.20.40.60.81185919422025

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 1 against 1 in East Timor, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was East Timor ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda East Timor Difference Ahead
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0.3 0 0.3 Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 1 0 1 Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0.6 0.9 0.3 East Timor
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Antigua and Barbuda or East Timor?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 1 against 1 in East Timor as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Antigua and Barbuda and East Timor?
0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and East Timor?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and East Timor rank globally for competitive elections?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.