Antigua and Barbuda vs Marshall Islands: Competitive elections
Antigua and Barbuda
1
in 2025
Marshall Islands
1
in 2025
Antigua and Barbuda rank
1st
Marshall Islands rank
1st
Competitive elections over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 1 against 1 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Marshall Islands in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 1980s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Marshall Islands |
| 1990s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Marshall Islands |
| 2000s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitive elections, Antigua and Barbuda or Marshall Islands?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 1 against 1 in Marshall Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in competitive elections between Antigua and Barbuda and Marshall Islands?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Marshall Islands?
- 75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Marshall Islands rank globally for competitive elections?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.