Antigua and Barbuda vs Gambia: Competitive elections

Antigua and Barbuda
1
in 2025
Gambia
1
in 2025
Antigua and Barbuda rank
1st
Gambia rank
1st

Competitive elections over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Gambia
00.20.40.60.81188919572025

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 1 against 1 in Gambia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Gambia ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and Gambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Gambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Gambia Difference Ahead
1950s 0 0 0
1960s 0.3 0.7 0.4 Gambia
1970s 1 1 0
1980s 0 1 1 Gambia
1990s 0 0.4 0.4 Gambia
2000s 0.6 0 0.6 Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 1 0.3 0.7 Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitive elections, Antigua and Barbuda or Gambia?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 1 against 1 in Gambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in competitive elections between Antigua and Barbuda and Gambia?
0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Gambia?
75 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2025.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Gambia rank globally for competitive elections?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 1st and Gambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitive elections. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitive elections
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Whether the outcomes of elections are uncertain because their timing is not violated, voters are not systematically coerced, and election fraud is not consequential.