Angola vs Papua New Guinea: CO2 emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Land-Use Change and Forestry

Angola
35.59
in 2018
Papua New Guinea
41
in 2018
Angola rank
17th
Papua New Guinea rank
16th

CO2 emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Land-Use Change and Forestry over time

  • Angola
  • Papua New Guinea
10203040199020042018

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 41 against 35.59 in Angola, a difference of 5.41.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Angola ranks 17th and Papua New Guinea ranks 16th of 183 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 10.27 30.56 20.28 Papua New Guinea
2000s 33.08 34.31 1.23 Papua New Guinea
2010s 35.6 39.66 4.06 Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - land-use change and forestry, Angola or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 41 against 35.59 in Angola as of 2018.
What is the difference in co2 emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - land-use change and forestry between Angola and Papua New Guinea?
5.41, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Papua New Guinea?
29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
How do Angola and Papua New Guinea rank globally for co2 emissions by sector (mt co2 eq) - land-use change and forestry?
Angola ranks 17th and Papua New Guinea ranks 16th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Climate Watch. 2020. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Available online at: https://www.climatewatchdata.org, published as CO2 emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Land-Use Change and Forestry. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Papua New Guinea: CO2 emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Land-Use Change and Forestry. Statizoid, drawing on Climate Watch. 2020. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Available online at: https://www.climatewatchdata.org. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-by-sector-mt-co2-eq-land-use-change-and-forestry/angola/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-by-sector-mt-co2-eq-land-use-change-and-forestry/angola/papua-new-guinea/">Angola vs Papua New Guinea: CO2 emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Land-Use Change and Forestry</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO2 emissions by sector (Mt CO2 eq) - Land-Use Change and Forestry
Source
Climate Watch. 2020. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Available online at: https://www.climatewatchdata.org
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 5,305 data points, 1990–2018
Last refreshed

Land-Use Change and Forestry sector CO2 emissions are generated from the World Resource Institute's Climate Watch. Climate Watch Historical Emission data contains sector-level greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data for 194 countries and the European Union (EU) for the period 1990-2018, including emissions of the six major GHGs from most major sources and sinks. Non-CO2 emissions are expressed in CO2 equivalents using 100-year global warming potential values from IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Climate Watch Historical GHG Emissions data (previously published through CAIT Climate Data Explorer) are derived from several sources. Any use of the Land-Use Change and Forestry or Agriculture indicator should be cited as FAO 2020, FAOSTAT Emissions Database. Any use of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion data should be cited as CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, OECD/IEA, 2020.