Panama vs Sudan: Clientelism Index
Panama
0.596
in 2025
Sudan
0.598
in 2025
Panama rank
62nd
Sudan rank
61st
Clientelism Index over time
- Panama
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.598 against 0.596 in Panama, a difference of 0.002.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 123 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 62nd and Sudan ranks 61st of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 10 and Sudan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.8709 | 0.695 | 0.1759 | Panama |
| 1910s | 0.8771 | 0.695 | 0.1821 | Panama |
| 1920s | 0.8643 | 0.695 | 0.1693 | Panama |
| 1930s | 0.8598 | 0.695 | 0.1648 | Panama |
| 1940s | 0.8439 | 0.6932 | 0.1507 | Panama |
| 1950s | 0.8181 | 0.6454 | 0.1727 | Panama |
| 1960s | 0.8045 | 0.6597 | 0.1448 | Panama |
| 1970s | 0.6538 | 0.7093 | 0.0555 | Sudan |
| 1980s | 0.8629 | 0.6108 | 0.2521 | Panama |
| 1990s | 0.6722 | 0.6846 | 0.0124 | Sudan |
| 2000s | 0.686 | 0.7301 | 0.0441 | Sudan |
| 2010s | 0.6749 | 0.6306 | 0.0443 | Panama |
| 2020s | 0.6275 | 0.6162 | 0.0113 | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Panama or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0.598 against 0.596 in Panama as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Panama and Sudan?
- 0.002, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Sudan?
- 123 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2025.
- How do Panama and Sudan rank globally for clientelism index?
- Panama ranks 62nd and Sudan ranks 61st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.