Nigeria vs Zimbabwe: Clientelism Index
Nigeria
0.702
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0.703
in 2025
Nigeria rank
45th
Zimbabwe rank
44th
Clientelism Index over time
- Nigeria
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.703 against 0.702 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.001.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 112 shared years of data; in 1914 it was Nigeria ahead.
Nigeria ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 44th of 176 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.859 | 0.3888 | 0.4702 | Nigeria |
| 1920s | 0.8126 | 0.333 | 0.4796 | Nigeria |
| 1930s | 0.801 | 0.2944 | 0.5066 | Nigeria |
| 1940s | 0.8162 | 0.2981 | 0.5181 | Nigeria |
| 1950s | 0.8389 | 0.3149 | 0.524 | Nigeria |
| 1960s | 0.8459 | 0.3084 | 0.5375 | Nigeria |
| 1970s | 0.8533 | 0.3214 | 0.5319 | Nigeria |
| 1980s | 0.8961 | 0.5613 | 0.3348 | Nigeria |
| 1990s | 0.8546 | 0.5859 | 0.2687 | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 0.8332 | 0.7539 | 0.0793 | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 0.7821 | 0.7189 | 0.0632 | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 0.7898 | 0.6908 | 0.099 | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Nigeria or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.703 against 0.702 in Nigeria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Nigeria and Zimbabwe?
- 0.001, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Zimbabwe?
- 112 years are reported by both, from 1914 to 2025.
- How do Nigeria and Zimbabwe rank globally for clientelism index?
- Nigeria ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 44th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.