Mexico vs Zambia: Clientelism Index
Mexico
0.479
in 2025
Zambia
0.488
in 2025
Mexico rank
92nd
Zambia rank
89th
Clientelism Index over time
- Mexico
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0.488 against 0.479 in Mexico, a difference of 0.009.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 92nd and Zambia ranks 89th of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 10 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.7838 | 0.5596 | 0.2242 | Mexico |
| 1920s | 0.881 | 0.4695 | 0.4115 | Mexico |
| 1930s | 0.8823 | 0.3272 | 0.5551 | Mexico |
| 1940s | 0.9041 | 0.2973 | 0.6068 | Mexico |
| 1950s | 0.9044 | 0.2894 | 0.615 | Mexico |
| 1960s | 0.8893 | 0.2503 | 0.639 | Mexico |
| 1970s | 0.8671 | 0.2909 | 0.5762 | Mexico |
| 1980s | 0.7686 | 0.3756 | 0.393 | Mexico |
| 1990s | 0.5886 | 0.4134 | 0.1752 | Mexico |
| 2000s | 0.3543 | 0.4901 | 0.1358 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0.4256 | 0.5745 | 0.1489 | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0.483 | 0.48 | 0.003 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Mexico or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0.488 against 0.479 in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Mexico and Zambia?
- 0.009, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Zambia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Mexico and Zambia rank globally for clientelism index?
- Mexico ranks 92nd and Zambia ranks 89th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.