Kuwait vs Panama: Clientelism Index
Kuwait
0.596
in 2025
Panama
0.596
in 2025
Kuwait rank
62nd
Panama rank
62nd
Clientelism Index over time
- Kuwait
- Panama
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 0.596 against 0.596 in Panama, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 123 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Panama ahead.
Kuwait ranks 62nd and Panama ranks 62nd of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 11.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.788 | 0.8709 | 0.0829 | Panama |
| 1910s | 0.7788 | 0.8771 | 0.0983 | Panama |
| 1920s | 0.8397 | 0.8643 | 0.0246 | Panama |
| 1930s | 0.8131 | 0.8598 | 0.0467 | Panama |
| 1940s | 0.7696 | 0.8439 | 0.0743 | Panama |
| 1950s | 0.687 | 0.8181 | 0.1311 | Panama |
| 1960s | 0.6395 | 0.8045 | 0.165 | Panama |
| 1970s | 0.6287 | 0.6538 | 0.0251 | Panama |
| 1980s | 0.6529 | 0.8629 | 0.21 | Panama |
| 1990s | 0.6576 | 0.6722 | 0.0146 | Panama |
| 2000s | 0.6509 | 0.686 | 0.0351 | Panama |
| 2010s | 0.69 | 0.6749 | 0.0151 | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 0.6377 | 0.6275 | 0.0102 | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Kuwait or Panama?
- Kuwait, at 0.596 against 0.596 in Panama as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Kuwait and Panama?
- 0, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Panama?
- 123 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2025.
- How do Kuwait and Panama rank globally for clientelism index?
- Kuwait ranks 62nd and Panama ranks 62nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.