Kenya vs Mexico: Clientelism Index
Kenya
0.487
in 2025
Mexico
0.479
in 2025
Kenya rank
90th
Mexico rank
92nd
Clientelism Index over time
- Kenya
- Mexico
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 0.487 against 0.479 in Mexico, a difference of 0.008.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Mexico ahead.
Kenya ranks 90th and Mexico ranks 92nd of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 3 and Mexico in 10.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.616 | 0.803 | 0.187 | Mexico |
| 1910s | 0.616 | 0.7897 | 0.1737 | Mexico |
| 1920s | 0.3503 | 0.881 | 0.5307 | Mexico |
| 1930s | 0.3751 | 0.8823 | 0.5072 | Mexico |
| 1940s | 0.3295 | 0.9041 | 0.5746 | Mexico |
| 1950s | 0.3075 | 0.9044 | 0.5969 | Mexico |
| 1960s | 0.4713 | 0.8893 | 0.418 | Mexico |
| 1970s | 0.6138 | 0.8671 | 0.2533 | Mexico |
| 1980s | 0.7151 | 0.7686 | 0.0535 | Mexico |
| 1990s | 0.6852 | 0.5886 | 0.0966 | Kenya |
| 2000s | 0.6012 | 0.3543 | 0.2469 | Kenya |
| 2010s | 0.495 | 0.4256 | 0.0694 | Kenya |
| 2020s | 0.4315 | 0.483 | 0.0515 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Kenya or Mexico?
- Kenya, at 0.487 against 0.479 in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Kenya and Mexico?
- 0.008, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Mexico?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Kenya and Mexico rank globally for clientelism index?
- Kenya ranks 90th and Mexico ranks 92nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.