Iran vs Maldives: Clientelism Index
Iran
0.382
in 2025
Maldives
0.38
in 2025
Iran rank
113th
Maldives rank
114th
Clientelism Index over time
- Iran
- Maldives
How they compare
Iran currently reports 0.382 against 0.38 in Maldives, a difference of 0.002.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Iran ahead.
Iran ranks 113th and Maldives ranks 114th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Iran averaged higher in 6 and Maldives in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.605 | 0.539 | 0.066 | Iran |
| 1910s | 0.599 | 0.539 | 0.06 | Iran |
| 1920s | 0.5862 | 0.539 | 0.0472 | Iran |
| 1930s | 0.5004 | 0.539 | 0.0386 | Maldives |
| 1940s | 0.394 | 0.539 | 0.145 | Maldives |
| 1950s | 0.4003 | 0.539 | 0.1387 | Maldives |
| 1960s | 0.6045 | 0.5332 | 0.0713 | Iran |
| 1970s | 0.661 | 0.5351 | 0.1259 | Iran |
| 1980s | 0.3495 | 0.5542 | 0.2047 | Maldives |
| 1990s | 0.3164 | 0.5414 | 0.225 | Maldives |
| 2000s | 0.328 | 0.4713 | 0.1433 | Maldives |
| 2010s | 0.3698 | 0.4925 | 0.1227 | Maldives |
| 2020s | 0.4333 | 0.3575 | 0.0758 | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Iran or Maldives?
- Iran, at 0.382 against 0.38 in Maldives as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Iran and Maldives?
- 0.002, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Maldives?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Iran and Maldives rank globally for clientelism index?
- Iran ranks 113th and Maldives ranks 114th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.