Hungary vs Zambia: Clientelism Index
Hungary
0.502
in 2025
Zambia
0.488
in 2025
Hungary rank
87th
Zambia rank
89th
Clientelism Index over time
- Hungary
- Zambia
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 0.502 against 0.488 in Zambia, a difference of 0.014.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 87th and Zambia ranks 89th of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 8 and Zambia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.6454 | 0.5596 | 0.0859 | Hungary |
| 1920s | 0.6455 | 0.4695 | 0.176 | Hungary |
| 1930s | 0.6983 | 0.3272 | 0.3711 | Hungary |
| 1940s | 0.4883 | 0.2973 | 0.191 | Hungary |
| 1950s | 0.3381 | 0.2894 | 0.0487 | Hungary |
| 1960s | 0.3153 | 0.2503 | 0.065 | Hungary |
| 1970s | 0.3414 | 0.2909 | 0.0505 | Hungary |
| 1980s | 0.272 | 0.3756 | 0.1036 | Zambia |
| 1990s | 0.3314 | 0.4134 | 0.082 | Zambia |
| 2000s | 0.3291 | 0.4901 | 0.161 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0.4087 | 0.5745 | 0.1658 | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0.5318 | 0.48 | 0.0518 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Hungary or Zambia?
- Hungary, at 0.502 against 0.488 in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Hungary and Zambia?
- 0.014, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Zambia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and Zambia rank globally for clientelism index?
- Hungary ranks 87th and Zambia ranks 89th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.