Hungary vs Kenya: Clientelism Index
Hungary
0.502
in 2025
Kenya
0.487
in 2025
Hungary rank
87th
Kenya rank
90th
Clientelism Index over time
- Hungary
- Kenya
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 0.502 against 0.487 in Kenya, a difference of 0.015.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 87th and Kenya ranks 90th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 7 and Kenya in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.7486 | 0.616 | 0.1326 | Hungary |
| 1910s | 0.6503 | 0.616 | 0.0343 | Hungary |
| 1920s | 0.6455 | 0.3503 | 0.2952 | Hungary |
| 1930s | 0.6983 | 0.3751 | 0.3232 | Hungary |
| 1940s | 0.4883 | 0.3295 | 0.1588 | Hungary |
| 1950s | 0.3381 | 0.3075 | 0.0306 | Hungary |
| 1960s | 0.3153 | 0.4713 | 0.156 | Kenya |
| 1970s | 0.3414 | 0.6138 | 0.2724 | Kenya |
| 1980s | 0.272 | 0.7151 | 0.4431 | Kenya |
| 1990s | 0.3314 | 0.6852 | 0.3538 | Kenya |
| 2000s | 0.3291 | 0.6012 | 0.2721 | Kenya |
| 2010s | 0.4087 | 0.495 | 0.0863 | Kenya |
| 2020s | 0.5318 | 0.4315 | 0.1003 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Hungary or Kenya?
- Hungary, at 0.502 against 0.487 in Kenya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Hungary and Kenya?
- 0.015, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Kenya?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and Kenya rank globally for clientelism index?
- Hungary ranks 87th and Kenya ranks 90th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.