Gambia vs Iran: Clientelism Index
Gambia
0.373
in 2025
Iran
0.382
in 2025
Gambia rank
115th
Iran rank
113th
Clientelism Index over time
- Gambia
- Iran
How they compare
Iran currently reports 0.382 against 0.373 in Gambia, a difference of 0.009.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 115th and Iran ranks 113th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 10 and Iran in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Iran | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.797 | 0.605 | 0.192 | Gambia |
| 1910s | 0.797 | 0.599 | 0.198 | Gambia |
| 1920s | 0.797 | 0.5862 | 0.2108 | Gambia |
| 1930s | 0.797 | 0.5004 | 0.2966 | Gambia |
| 1940s | 0.7461 | 0.394 | 0.3521 | Gambia |
| 1950s | 0.5813 | 0.4003 | 0.181 | Gambia |
| 1960s | 0.5256 | 0.6045 | 0.0789 | Iran |
| 1970s | 0.4209 | 0.661 | 0.2401 | Iran |
| 1980s | 0.482 | 0.3495 | 0.1325 | Gambia |
| 1990s | 0.5269 | 0.3164 | 0.2105 | Gambia |
| 2000s | 0.5608 | 0.328 | 0.2328 | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0.5458 | 0.3698 | 0.176 | Gambia |
| 2020s | 0.366 | 0.4333 | 0.0673 | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Gambia or Iran?
- Iran, at 0.382 against 0.373 in Gambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Gambia and Iran?
- 0.009, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Iran?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Gambia and Iran rank globally for clientelism index?
- Gambia ranks 115th and Iran ranks 113th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.