Comoros vs Indonesia: Clientelism Index
Comoros
0.705
in 2025
Indonesia
0.713
in 2025
Comoros rank
42nd
Indonesia rank
40th
Clientelism Index over time
- Comoros
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 0.713 against 0.705 in Comoros, a difference of 0.008.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 94 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 42nd and Indonesia ranks 40th of 176 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.861 | 0.673 | 0.188 | Comoros |
| 1910s | 0.861 | 0.673 | 0.188 | Comoros |
| 1940s | 0.858 | 0.4655 | 0.3925 | Comoros |
| 1950s | 0.844 | 0.3104 | 0.5336 | Comoros |
| 1960s | 0.823 | 0.5611 | 0.2619 | Comoros |
| 1970s | 0.7803 | 0.5498 | 0.2305 | Comoros |
| 1980s | 0.8234 | 0.6327 | 0.1907 | Comoros |
| 1990s | 0.7394 | 0.5727 | 0.1667 | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.7549 | 0.5164 | 0.2385 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0.7598 | 0.5941 | 0.1657 | Comoros |
| 2020s | 0.7603 | 0.6638 | 0.0965 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Comoros or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 0.713 against 0.705 in Comoros as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Comoros and Indonesia?
- 0.008, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Indonesia?
- 94 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Indonesia rank globally for clientelism index?
- Comoros ranks 42nd and Indonesia ranks 40th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.