Botswana vs Iran: Clientelism Index
Botswana
0.395
in 2025
Iran
0.382
in 2025
Botswana rank
112th
Iran rank
113th
Clientelism Index over time
- Botswana
- Iran
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.395 against 0.382 in Iran, a difference of 0.013.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Iran ahead.
Botswana ranks 112th and Iran ranks 113th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Iran in 11.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Iran | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.444 | 0.605 | 0.161 | Iran |
| 1910s | 0.444 | 0.599 | 0.155 | Iran |
| 1920s | 0.444 | 0.5862 | 0.1422 | Iran |
| 1930s | 0.444 | 0.5004 | 0.0564 | Iran |
| 1940s | 0.444 | 0.394 | 0.05 | Botswana |
| 1950s | 0.454 | 0.4003 | 0.0537 | Botswana |
| 1960s | 0.3428 | 0.6045 | 0.2617 | Iran |
| 1970s | 0.2289 | 0.661 | 0.4321 | Iran |
| 1980s | 0.1742 | 0.3495 | 0.1753 | Iran |
| 1990s | 0.1719 | 0.3164 | 0.1445 | Iran |
| 2000s | 0.1733 | 0.328 | 0.1547 | Iran |
| 2010s | 0.2117 | 0.3698 | 0.1581 | Iran |
| 2020s | 0.3735 | 0.4333 | 0.0598 | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Botswana or Iran?
- Botswana, at 0.395 against 0.382 in Iran as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Botswana and Iran?
- 0.013, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Iran?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and Iran rank globally for clientelism index?
- Botswana ranks 112th and Iran ranks 113th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.