Congo vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 30-34 with secondary
Congo
34.1%
in 2010
Latvia
35.1%
in 2010
Congo rank
13th
Latvia rank
11th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 30-34 with secondary over time
- Congo
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 35.1% against 34.1% in Congo, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Congo ranks 13th and Latvia ranks 11th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4% | 17.8% | 17.4% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 2.4% | 27.3% | 24.8% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 12.1% | 33.2% | 21.1% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 32.0% | 34.7% | 2.7% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 55.5% | 34.3% | 21.1% | Congo |
| 2010s | 34.1% | 35.1% | 1.1% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 30-34 with secondary, Congo or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 35.1% against 34.1% in Congo as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 30-34 with secondary between Congo and Latvia?
- 1.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Congo and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 30-34 with secondary?
- Congo ranks 13th and Latvia ranks 11th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 30-34 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.