Morocco vs Myanmar: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Morocco
235.67 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Myanmar
220.38 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Morocco rank
109th
Myanmar rank
111th

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Morocco
  • Myanmar
100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 235.67 kilograms per year per capita against 220.38 kilograms per year per capita in Myanmar, a difference of 15.29 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.

Morocco ranks 109th and Myanmar ranks 111th of 192 countries.

Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 114.66 kilograms per year per capita 68.34 kilograms per year per capita 46.32 kilograms per year per capita Morocco
1970s 137.7 kilograms per year per capita 87.5 kilograms per year per capita 50.19 kilograms per year per capita Morocco
1980s 193.49 kilograms per year per capita 123.18 kilograms per year per capita 70.31 kilograms per year per capita Morocco
1990s 264.38 kilograms per year per capita 146.35 kilograms per year per capita 118.03 kilograms per year per capita Morocco
2000s 349.86 kilograms per year per capita 209.63 kilograms per year per capita 140.24 kilograms per year per capita Morocco
2010s 324.01 kilograms per year per capita 239.51 kilograms per year per capita 84.5 kilograms per year per capita Morocco
2020s 249.51 kilograms per year per capita 224.96 kilograms per year per capita 24.55 kilograms per year per capita Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Morocco or Myanmar?
Morocco, at 235.67 kilograms per year per capita against 220.38 kilograms per year per capita in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Morocco and Myanmar?
15.29 kilograms per year per capita, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Morocco and Myanmar rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Morocco ranks 109th and Myanmar ranks 111th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Myanmar: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/morocco/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/morocco/myanmar/">Morocco vs Myanmar: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.