Mauritius vs Sweden: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Mauritius
420.18 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Sweden
434.54 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Mauritius rank
44th
Sweden rank
41st

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sweden
100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 434.54 kilograms per year per capita against 420.18 kilograms per year per capita in Mauritius, a difference of 14.36 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Mauritius ranks 44th and Sweden ranks 41st of 192 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 93.52 kilograms per year per capita 99.7 kilograms per year per capita 6.17 kilograms per year per capita Sweden
1970s 72.19 kilograms per year per capita 114.15 kilograms per year per capita 41.96 kilograms per year per capita Sweden
1980s 82.27 kilograms per year per capita 148.2 kilograms per year per capita 65.93 kilograms per year per capita Sweden
1990s 164.96 kilograms per year per capita 186.82 kilograms per year per capita 21.85 kilograms per year per capita Sweden
2000s 206.36 kilograms per year per capita 226.98 kilograms per year per capita 20.62 kilograms per year per capita Sweden
2010s 280.84 kilograms per year per capita 464.62 kilograms per year per capita 183.79 kilograms per year per capita Sweden
2020s 356.88 kilograms per year per capita 453.67 kilograms per year per capita 96.79 kilograms per year per capita Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Mauritius or Sweden?
Sweden, at 434.54 kilograms per year per capita against 420.18 kilograms per year per capita in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Mauritius and Sweden?
14.36 kilograms per year per capita, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Sweden rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Mauritius ranks 44th and Sweden ranks 41st of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sweden: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/mauritius/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/mauritius/sweden/">Mauritius vs Sweden: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.