Malawi vs Myanmar: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Malawi
236.9 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Myanmar
220.38 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Malawi rank
108th
Myanmar rank
111th

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Malawi
  • Myanmar
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 236.9 kilograms per year per capita against 220.38 kilograms per year per capita in Myanmar, a difference of 16.52 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 108th and Myanmar ranks 111th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Myanmar in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 78.01 kilograms per year per capita 68.34 kilograms per year per capita 9.66 kilograms per year per capita Malawi
1970s 84.56 kilograms per year per capita 87.5 kilograms per year per capita 2.94 kilograms per year per capita Myanmar
1980s 76.06 kilograms per year per capita 123.18 kilograms per year per capita 47.12 kilograms per year per capita Myanmar
1990s 61.69 kilograms per year per capita 146.35 kilograms per year per capita 84.66 kilograms per year per capita Myanmar
2000s 60.36 kilograms per year per capita 209.63 kilograms per year per capita 149.27 kilograms per year per capita Myanmar
2010s 152.07 kilograms per year per capita 239.51 kilograms per year per capita 87.44 kilograms per year per capita Myanmar
2020s 234.58 kilograms per year per capita 224.96 kilograms per year per capita 9.62 kilograms per year per capita Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Malawi or Myanmar?
Malawi, at 236.9 kilograms per year per capita against 220.38 kilograms per year per capita in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Malawi and Myanmar?
16.52 kilograms per year per capita, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Myanmar rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Malawi ranks 108th and Myanmar ranks 111th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Myanmar: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/malawi/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/malawi/myanmar/">Malawi vs Myanmar: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.