Macao vs Zimbabwe: Average per capita vegetable intake vs minimum recommended guidelines
Macao
371.16
in 2023
Zimbabwe
368.09
in 2023
Macao rank
58th
Zimbabwe rank
59th
Average per capita vegetable intake vs minimum recommended guidelines over time
- Macao
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Macao currently reports 371.16 against 368.09 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.07.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.
Macao ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 59th of 192 countries.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 111.8 | 50.41 | 61.39 | Macao |
| 1970s | 131.42 | 50.42 | 81 | Macao |
| 1980s | 264.28 | 41.24 | 223.03 | Macao |
| 1990s | 238.38 | 32.33 | 206.05 | Macao |
| 2000s | 251.6 | 35.05 | 216.55 | Macao |
| 2010s | 350.01 | 73.53 | 276.48 | Macao |
| 2020s | 370.18 | 281.01 | 89.17 | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs minimum recommended guidelines, Macao or Zimbabwe?
- Macao, at 371.16 against 368.09 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs minimum recommended guidelines between Macao and Zimbabwe?
- 3.07, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Macao and Zimbabwe rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs minimum recommended guidelines?
- Macao ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 59th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.