Liberia vs Uganda: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Liberia
74.25 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Uganda
76.31 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Liberia rank
177th
Uganda rank
175th

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Liberia
  • Uganda
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 76.31 kilograms per year per capita against 74.25 kilograms per year per capita in Liberia, a difference of 2.06 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.

Liberia ranks 177th and Uganda ranks 175th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 96.86 kilograms per year per capita 53.51 kilograms per year per capita 43.35 kilograms per year per capita Liberia
1970s 89.36 kilograms per year per capita 51.87 kilograms per year per capita 37.49 kilograms per year per capita Liberia
1980s 87.17 kilograms per year per capita 57.04 kilograms per year per capita 30.13 kilograms per year per capita Liberia
1990s 101.3 kilograms per year per capita 56.37 kilograms per year per capita 44.93 kilograms per year per capita Liberia
2000s 89.56 kilograms per year per capita 63.3 kilograms per year per capita 26.25 kilograms per year per capita Liberia
2010s 79.75 kilograms per year per capita 89.56 kilograms per year per capita 9.81 kilograms per year per capita Uganda
2020s 76.71 kilograms per year per capita 79.1 kilograms per year per capita 2.39 kilograms per year per capita Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Liberia or Uganda?
Uganda, at 76.31 kilograms per year per capita against 74.25 kilograms per year per capita in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Liberia and Uganda?
2.06 kilograms per year per capita, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Liberia and Uganda rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Liberia ranks 177th and Uganda ranks 175th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs Uganda: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/liberia/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/liberia/uganda/">Liberia vs Uganda: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.