South Korea vs Laos: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

South Korea
588.06 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Laos
552.19 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
South Korea rank
17th
Laos rank
19th

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • South Korea
  • Laos
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 588.06 kilograms per year per capita against 552.19 kilograms per year per capita in Laos, a difference of 35.87 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Laos's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Korea ahead.

South Korea ranks 17th and Laos ranks 19th of 192 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Laos Difference Ahead
1960s 223.53 kilograms per year per capita 55.72 kilograms per year per capita 167.82 kilograms per year per capita South Korea
1970s 394.13 kilograms per year per capita 39.58 kilograms per year per capita 354.55 kilograms per year per capita South Korea
1980s 514.71 kilograms per year per capita 35.75 kilograms per year per capita 478.95 kilograms per year per capita South Korea
1990s 561.68 kilograms per year per capita 59.89 kilograms per year per capita 501.8 kilograms per year per capita South Korea
2000s 600.08 kilograms per year per capita 329.94 kilograms per year per capita 270.14 kilograms per year per capita South Korea
2010s 617.57 kilograms per year per capita 566.62 kilograms per year per capita 50.95 kilograms per year per capita South Korea
2020s 600.74 kilograms per year per capita 554.99 kilograms per year per capita 45.75 kilograms per year per capita South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, South Korea or Laos?
South Korea, at 588.06 kilograms per year per capita against 552.19 kilograms per year per capita in Laos as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between South Korea and Laos?
35.87 kilograms per year per capita, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Laos?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Korea and Laos rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
South Korea ranks 17th and Laos ranks 19th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Laos: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/korea-rep/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/korea-rep/lao-pdr/">South Korea vs Laos: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.