Guatemala vs Nigeria: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Guatemala
185.09 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Nigeria
178.4 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Guatemala rank
123rd
Nigeria rank
126th

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Guatemala
  • Nigeria
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 185.09 kilograms per year per capita against 178.4 kilograms per year per capita in Nigeria, a difference of 6.69 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nigeria ahead.

Guatemala ranks 123rd and Nigeria ranks 126th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 71.07 kilograms per year per capita 130.91 kilograms per year per capita 59.84 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
1970s 76.04 kilograms per year per capita 124.41 kilograms per year per capita 48.37 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
1980s 99.88 kilograms per year per capita 110.28 kilograms per year per capita 10.4 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
1990s 122.99 kilograms per year per capita 141.85 kilograms per year per capita 18.87 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
2000s 157.02 kilograms per year per capita 175.77 kilograms per year per capita 18.74 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
2010s 141.83 kilograms per year per capita 186.16 kilograms per year per capita 44.34 kilograms per year per capita Nigeria
2020s 187.06 kilograms per year per capita 179.65 kilograms per year per capita 7.41 kilograms per year per capita Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Guatemala or Nigeria?
Guatemala, at 185.09 kilograms per year per capita against 178.4 kilograms per year per capita in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Guatemala and Nigeria?
6.69 kilograms per year per capita, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Nigeria?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Nigeria rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Guatemala ranks 123rd and Nigeria ranks 126th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Nigeria: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/guatemala/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/guatemala/nigeria/">Guatemala vs Nigeria: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.