Guatemala vs Mexico: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Guatemala
185.09 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Mexico
182.13 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Guatemala rank
123rd
Mexico rank
124th

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Guatemala
  • Mexico
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 185.09 kilograms per year per capita against 182.13 kilograms per year per capita in Mexico, a difference of 2.96 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Guatemala ranks 123rd and Mexico ranks 124th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 71.07 kilograms per year per capita 76.55 kilograms per year per capita 5.48 kilograms per year per capita Mexico
1970s 76.04 kilograms per year per capita 95.88 kilograms per year per capita 19.84 kilograms per year per capita Mexico
1980s 99.88 kilograms per year per capita 125.72 kilograms per year per capita 25.84 kilograms per year per capita Mexico
1990s 122.99 kilograms per year per capita 147.63 kilograms per year per capita 24.65 kilograms per year per capita Mexico
2000s 157.02 kilograms per year per capita 182.37 kilograms per year per capita 25.35 kilograms per year per capita Mexico
2010s 141.83 kilograms per year per capita 170.2 kilograms per year per capita 28.37 kilograms per year per capita Mexico
2020s 187.06 kilograms per year per capita 161 kilograms per year per capita 26.06 kilograms per year per capita Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Guatemala or Mexico?
Guatemala, at 185.09 kilograms per year per capita against 182.13 kilograms per year per capita in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Guatemala and Mexico?
2.96 kilograms per year per capita, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Mexico rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Guatemala ranks 123rd and Mexico ranks 124th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Mexico: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/guatemala/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/guatemala/mexico/">Guatemala vs Mexico: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.