Ghana vs East Timor: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Ghana
79.93 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
East Timor
76.25 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Ghana rank
173rd
East Timor rank
176th

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Ghana
  • East Timor
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 79.93 kilograms per year per capita against 76.25 kilograms per year per capita in East Timor, a difference of 3.68 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was East Timor ahead.

Ghana ranks 173rd and East Timor ranks 176th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 4 and East Timor in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 61.67 kilograms per year per capita 93.52 kilograms per year per capita 31.85 kilograms per year per capita East Timor
1970s 96.58 kilograms per year per capita 96.99 kilograms per year per capita 0.4076 kilograms per year per capita East Timor
1980s 55.39 kilograms per year per capita 86.8 kilograms per year per capita 31.41 kilograms per year per capita East Timor
1990s 81.31 kilograms per year per capita 69.62 kilograms per year per capita 11.69 kilograms per year per capita Ghana
2000s 81.52 kilograms per year per capita 79.08 kilograms per year per capita 2.44 kilograms per year per capita Ghana
2010s 143.41 kilograms per year per capita 72.28 kilograms per year per capita 71.13 kilograms per year per capita Ghana
2020s 101.85 kilograms per year per capita 73.31 kilograms per year per capita 28.54 kilograms per year per capita Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Ghana or East Timor?
Ghana, at 79.93 kilograms per year per capita against 76.25 kilograms per year per capita in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Ghana and East Timor?
3.68 kilograms per year per capita, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and East Timor?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ghana and East Timor rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Ghana ranks 173rd and East Timor ranks 176th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs East Timor: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/ghana/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/ghana/timor-leste/">Ghana vs East Timor: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.