Brazil vs Saint Lucia: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Brazil
143.58 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Saint Lucia
141.16 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Brazil rank
139th
Saint Lucia rank
141st

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Brazil
  • Saint Lucia
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 143.58 kilograms per year per capita against 141.16 kilograms per year per capita in Saint Lucia, a difference of 2.42 kilograms per year per capita.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 139th and Saint Lucia ranks 141st of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 6 and Saint Lucia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1960s 68.41 kilograms per year per capita 25.66 kilograms per year per capita 42.75 kilograms per year per capita Brazil
1970s 74.08 kilograms per year per capita 30.55 kilograms per year per capita 43.53 kilograms per year per capita Brazil
1980s 86.62 kilograms per year per capita 41.49 kilograms per year per capita 45.13 kilograms per year per capita Brazil
1990s 99.4 kilograms per year per capita 66.64 kilograms per year per capita 32.76 kilograms per year per capita Brazil
2000s 123.31 kilograms per year per capita 101.33 kilograms per year per capita 21.98 kilograms per year per capita Brazil
2010s 147.92 kilograms per year per capita 119.49 kilograms per year per capita 28.43 kilograms per year per capita Brazil
2020s 140.37 kilograms per year per capita 140.93 kilograms per year per capita 0.5577 kilograms per year per capita Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Brazil or Saint Lucia?
Brazil, at 143.58 kilograms per year per capita against 141.16 kilograms per year per capita in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Brazil and Saint Lucia?
2.42 kilograms per year per capita, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Saint Lucia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Saint Lucia rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Brazil ranks 139th and Saint Lucia ranks 141st of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Saint Lucia: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/brazil/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/brazil/st-lucia/">Brazil vs Saint Lucia: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.