Bolivia vs Rwanda: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines

Bolivia
117.96 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Rwanda
124.78 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Bolivia rank
152nd
Rwanda rank
149th

Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines over time

  • Bolivia
  • Rwanda
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 124.78 kilograms per year per capita against 117.96 kilograms per year per capita in Bolivia, a difference of 6.82 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 152nd and Rwanda ranks 149th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 161.04 kilograms per year per capita 78.34 kilograms per year per capita 82.7 kilograms per year per capita Bolivia
1970s 158.41 kilograms per year per capita 76.57 kilograms per year per capita 81.84 kilograms per year per capita Bolivia
1980s 131.13 kilograms per year per capita 59.33 kilograms per year per capita 71.81 kilograms per year per capita Bolivia
1990s 139.19 kilograms per year per capita 60.36 kilograms per year per capita 78.82 kilograms per year per capita Bolivia
2000s 121.26 kilograms per year per capita 104.54 kilograms per year per capita 16.71 kilograms per year per capita Bolivia
2010s 97.15 kilograms per year per capita 135.17 kilograms per year per capita 38.03 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda
2020s 116.66 kilograms per year per capita 127.92 kilograms per year per capita 11.25 kilograms per year per capita Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines, Bolivia or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 124.78 kilograms per year per capita against 117.96 kilograms per year per capita in Bolivia as of 2023.
What is the difference in average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines between Bolivia and Rwanda?
6.82 kilograms per year per capita, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Rwanda rank globally for average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
Bolivia ranks 152nd and Rwanda ranks 149th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Rwanda: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/bolivia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/average-per-capita-vegetable-intake-vs-minimum-recommended-guidelines/bolivia/rwanda/">Bolivia vs Rwanda: Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Average per capita vegetable intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.